It was opened on the 13th of July, 1885, the magnificent national museum of the Netherlands; the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam. And it was festively re-opened on April 13th this year, after an almost 10 year renovation that brought the interior back to the old splendour from under white wash that came with 20st century “modernisations”. But even more important: it has been two months since the underpass for bicycles was re-opened on 13th of May, 2013.
The Rijksmuseum was built as a national exhibition building mainly to display the paintings of 16th and 17th century Dutch masters. At the time, other architects looked down on it. They called it a ‘medley of styles, with its renaissance-style arches, Neo-Gothic windows and medieval towers, out of step with contemporary life’. Architect Cuypers won a design competition, but even the king despised the building. He called it a catholic cathedral and as a protestant he refused to attend the opening. This controversy resembles the discussions about re-opening the underpass for people on bicycles that culminated late 2012 and continued until the final re-opening this May. The great-grand daughter of the stubborn king, Queen Beatrix, did come for that re-opening, the last museum she would open during her reign.
The underpass was an integral part of the original design. Amsterdam had allowed the building of the museum on the condition that the existing street would remain open to all traffic. It was after all the gateway to the new developments in Amsterdam South. The underpass at street level (often called ‘tunnel’ but it really isn’t that) was wide enough for a tram line. But that was never built. The underpass was open to motor traffic until 1931. The museum director at the time had already been asking for a traffic ban since 1925 but only achieved the compromise that motor traffic would be banned. Consecutive directors tried to turn the central underpass into a main entrance three times, in 1945, 1963 and 1975. But the city refused to give up the vital traffic connection.
For the major renovation of this century, the passage was finally closed, temporarily, in 2004. To the surprise of many, the Spanish architect of the renovation brought back the plans to turn the underpass into a main entrance. In 2009 an agreement was reached: there would be two entrances on either side of the bicycle path in the underpass, that would be re-opened.
But then the museum got a new director who tried to change the plans in 2011. He claimed the combination of two entrances and the cycle traffic would be dangerous to the many foreign pedestrians who wouldn’t understand the cycle path there. Amsterdam and its provincial cycle path through the national museum would be ridiculed by the world, he said. The local branch of the Cyclists’ Union disagreed. The city opposed as well, but the local authority (South District) agreed with the museum management. There was a nasty and public fight. There was a report with figures that were wrongly stating it would be safer to have a detour. The director claimed that dealing with the underpass cost him more time than taking care of the paintings and he also tried to make people believe this struggle postponed the re-opening of the museum with several years: ridiculous and false. Proponents of the underpass said the director, coming from Rotterdam, didn’t understand the sentiments of the people in Amsterdam, who love cycling far more than people from Rotterdam. But much more substantial: the Cyclists’ Union was able to prove that the figures used in the opponents’ report were wrong. Cycling through the underpass would be significantly safer for people on bicycles and on foot compared to having people cycling around the museum. The detour would involve left turns on busy intersections and because of the detour cyclists and pedestrians would cross each other’s paths many more times.
There was a court ruling: the underpass would have to be opened. But when the museum was finally re-opened the underpass was not. It was obvious that the management of the museum was trying to postpone and possibly prevent the re-opening even after the court ruling and the decision by the city. But the city then stepped in and demanded the re-opening that finally took place on May 13th.
I filmed the underpass on the 19th of May when the area was still full of line posts to prevent pedestrians and people on bicycles to interact with each other. These lines have since been removed. Initially the passage had been closed during the weekends, at visitor peak times. But everything runs so smoothly that it was announced yesterday that the underpass will be opened 24 hours a day, 7 days of the week from tomorrow, Friday 19th July, 2013.
Earlier this month a news paper had written that two months after the re-opening of the underpass there were no incidents at all and that nothing happened that would have decreased the safety of pedestrians and people on bicycles. The only concern was how to keep mopeds and scooters out of the underpass. For that, South District was now looking for young and unemployed people who could be employed as traffic officers at least until the end of the Summer of 2013.
The video shows many happy faces of people cycling through the underpass for the first time or for the first time in many years. It is obvious that many of the people on bicycles are tourists themselves. The identical rental bikes give that away. The world hasn’t ridiculed Amsterdam for its cycle underpass through its National Museum. Far from it: the underpass has become a tourist attraction on its own and many cities in the world would love to have the cycling climate Amsterdam has.
The underpass has its own Facebook page, called “I love cycling through the Rijksmuseum again”! There is a very nice video on the occasion of the reopening of the museum by the Economist. Pictures of happy people cycling through the cycle corridor by @Amsterdamized
17 thoughts on “Bicycle Underpass Rijksmuseum Amsterdam”
Savez vous quíl existe des visites guidees en francais a velo et dans les grands musees? Pour ceux qui on du mal a parler neerlandais.
Wow! Thanks for all that info gathered in one place! =)
There was a dreadful documentary on BBC television recently about the re-opening of the Museum in which the silly prancing idiot presenter claimed that it was because of the row over the cycle route that the Museum was closed for so long.
I recall during the row the museum man claiming that the tunnel was ‘too beautiful to be used as a cycle track’, to which the Fietsersbond replied that it was the ‘most beautiful cycle route in the Netherlands’.
It reminds me of a meeting a few years ago with some idiot from the Borough of Camden who opposed a cycle track on Byng Place (in Bloomsbury) on the aesthetic grounds that Byng Place was a ‘square’ (which in fact it isn’t) and that the diagonal, curving cycle track would destroy its historical architectural integrity. He seemed unaware of the fact that there were pre-existing standard British white lines marking the diagonal, curving road lanes through the Place. I asked him when the Place had been built & he didn’t know, so keen was he on the Place’s history!
We did get the track put in along with the wider Bloomsbury track, but when a Tory/LibDem coalition took power in Camden they removed it. Godverdomme.
I loved your summary of the background. Very clear and concise! Thanks.
So typical of things these days – take the cash and screw the public. If the museum director was threatened with time off in the cooler for breaking the agreement, this would have come to a much quicker settlement. And 2 entrances weren’t necessary.
If I remember correctly, the passage was destined to be used by cyclists in perpetuity, or until the Rijksmuseum ceased to exist. The fact that the man is from Rotterdam, where I happen to live, where cycling is not as popular as it is in Amsterdam, has nothing to do with it. He’s probably just a pompous ass, so full of himself that he was afraid of the ridicule from the art-world if he didn’t put a stop to those pesky cyclist cycling through his museum.
Well, I think it’s great! I’m sure I visited the Rijksmuseum, though I can’t remember it! My mother, a decorative arts teacher here in the United States, led many “field trips” to Europe for her adult lady students, and I went on some of those trips, and we also went sometimes just as a family, and we must have covered EVERY museum in Europe! I KNOW I’ve visited Amsterdam, and Rembrandt’s House, and De Kunstkamer in Rubenshuis in Antwerp, and Gouda. And I recall feeling rather sad at how the life of Rembrandt turned out vs. the life of Rubens. If only Rembrandt hadn’t collected so many expensive props for his paintings!
Anyway, I love Dutch, I love Amsterdam and I love its beautiful Rijksmuseum!