The Utrecht Maliebaan is a beautiful tree-lined avenue – over 60 metres wide – that was built almost 400 years ago as a sports track for a game that was also an ancestor of golf. A century ago, in the early 1920s, motor traffic was allowed to use the former sports track and soon after that decision it was forbidden for people cycling or walking to use that area. Now the car era is coming to an end in a lot of Dutch city centres the situation is going to change again. Motor traffic will be banned from the centre of the street. The space will be redesigned for walking and cycling. The Maliebaan will be a place where people will want to linger again.
Students in Utrecht complained that there was too little to do for them in the city when the University was opened in 1636. That is why a sports track was built for a game called Jeu de Mail, a predecessor of games like pall-mall, croquet and golf. This sports track was called Maliebaan. Malie after the game and baan simply means “track”. The game was very popular all over Europe. As such the Utrecht Maliebaan is a cousin to the London Pall Mall and Mall, the Palmaille in Hamburg, les allées du Mail in La Rochelle and even the Washington Mall. The track, just outside the fortified city and close to the city moat, was finished in 1637. It was 740 metres long and 4 rows of trees were planted on either side. A gate closed the track at both ends. Copies of the gate posts can again be found at the current beginning of the street. In the late 18th century the game went out of fashion but the Maliebaan remained a place for sports and leisure just outside the city.
In the entire 19th century horse races took place regularly, but the street was mostly used as a place for a walk where you needed to be seen on Sundays. Later in the 19th century the street began to develop into a street for the rich who built some grand houses. This was at the time the city started to grow exponentially. In 1885 another sports track appeared on the Maliebaan. People had complained about new and dangerous machines appearing in the streets; penny-farthings and other high-wheelers of which the owners were racing around pedestrians. That is why the city, in an attempt to regulate this, constructed a race track for these high-wheelers. This had been at the request of the new Cyclists’ Union, ANWB, which had been founded in this very street two years before. The very first cycle track of the Netherlands was opened on 15 September 1885, and was in fact a converted walk way between two of the rows of trees west of the central track. In the mid-19th century one line of trees had already been removed to create the service streets on either side, so the new grand houses could be reached by horse drawn carriages. The street had been designed for leisure and recreation and it had had that function for almost three centuries. By the 1920s, however, this began to change when the street was redesigned to accommodate the then growing motor traffic. The central carriageway got an asphalt surface and was opened for through motor traffic. Apparently that drew so much traffic that soon after (and certainly before 1936) the central road was closed to cycling. The street was then that way for almost 100 years, but it is going to change dramatically very soon.
Utrecht is a rapidly growing city, but the territory of the city is not expanding. That means more people will be using the same amount of space. This is why the city wants to give priority to traffic that takes up less space. Especially in the central parts of the city (where the Maliebaan is located) the role of the car is reduced and a lot of streets have been or will be reconstructed to reflect that new policy. I’ve already shown you posts about the nearby Maliesingel and Tolsteegsingel. For the Maliebaan there are several reasons for a reconstruction. The city wishes to:
- improve the cycle routes from the city centre to the university
- improve the public space for people walking and cycling
- improve the quality of the area, it needs to be more a space where people want to linger
- reconstruct the lost parts of the historic green spaces just outside the city centre
- reverse the design of the public space that only had moving motor traffic in mind
- increase traffic safety especially at the one big intersection.
From 2014 on, the city developed four alternatives to achieve these goals. The main challenge to tackle is the fact that traffic now runs in three locations; the central carriageway and two service streets. This makes the one big intersection with Nachtegaalstraat and Burgemeester Reigerstraat a very problematic one. At the last counts those two streets (which together cross the Maliebaan) carried a little over 4,000 motor vehicles and 18,133 and 17,254 people cycling respectively per 24 hours per working day. No wonder that the city has decided to turn those two streets into cycle streets where cycling has priority over motor traffic. That eliminates the need for traffic lights and the new design of the Maliebaan should take that into account. The city established there are four possible solutions:
- Keep the existing situation. This would achieve none of the goals. The current traffic light installation would have to be replaced and there are already unacceptable delays. The city dismissed this as a possible solution, although many of the residents prefer this.
- Keep the existing traffic layout but create an oval type of ‘roundabout’ at the intersection (without traffic lights). This would improve the traffic flow for all types of traffic but it would not be possible to restore the historic green situation, on the contrary: more green would have to be sacrificed because the oval roundabout takes more space than the current intersection. The situation for walking and cycling would not be improved either. Even with these disadvantages the city did determine that this would be an acceptable solution.
- The Maliebaan promenade. A redesign of the central carriageway for walking and cycling and relocating all motor traffic to the service streets. In one of the earlier versions of this plan no traffic could cross the Maliebaan from Nachtegaalstraat to the Burgemeester Reigerstraat and vice versa. As you can see from the traffic volumes on that route mentioned above that was unwanted. In the final version called 3+ there will be a crossing of the Maliebaan. After long debates the Mayor and the Executive Board finally chose this as their preferred solution.
- The T-junction. Only the southern part of Maliebaan would be made car free in this solution. The intersection with Nachtegaalstraat and Burgemeester Reigerstraat and the northern part of the Maliebaan would be turned into a T-junction. This would only half achieve the goals and because traffic could still use half the Maliebaan there would be more motor traffic in the entire area than with a full ban. (However, it was long thought this was the only viable solution, because people in Utrecht would not be ready for a complete ban of motor traffic in the central lanes of the Maliebaan.)
Once the preference for a motor traffic free entire central carriageway was made public some of the residents complained. They feared that more (heavy) traffic on the service streets would mean more damage to their homes. They started a petition against the plan and created an alternative plan called Plan B. Around 2,100 people signed their petition, a quarter of which live on the Maliebaan. In Plan B the residents proposed to keep the central carriageway open to motor traffic, but in the form of a cycle street where cars are guest. To take these proposals seriously the city had the plan examined. The possible consequences of both the residents’ alternative Plan B and the preferred 3+ Plan of the municipal executive board were thoroughly compared by an independent consultancy. Especially one large political party in the city council, D66, the liberal democrats, with 10 seats, was sympathetic to the plan of the residents, so it was absolutely unsure whether the plan from the Mayor and the Executive Board would be approved in the council. The main conclusions of the additional investigation were that in both plans the motor traffic volumes would stay well within reasonable limits on the service streets but that a cycle street in the centre could not be created safely. This is due to the volumes of the various traffic types and the fact that the central roadway does not meet the recommendations of a cycle street (there are no end destinations and there is nothing to stop car drivers from speeding on this long straight stretch). This would lead to the fact that too many people cycling would choose to keep on cycling on the service streets and that the central carriageway would be a cycle street in name only. In reality it would be the present situation with more danger for the few people who would decide to cycle there. With this information the Mayor and the Executive Board decided that the interests of the city are better served with their own plan than with the alternative plan of the residents. The expected decreased traffic safety was the main reason for the liberal democrats to change their view and vote in favour of the city’s plan in the final council meeting of 2019 after all.
With 26 votes in favour and 16 against, the Utrecht city council adopted the preferred 3+ Plan of the Mayor and the Executive Board. The further details of the plans will now have to be designed. This will take the rest of 2020. When the plans are finalised at the end of the year, the actual reconstruction can then take place in the spring of 2021. This is around the same time that the reconstruction of the Nachtegaalstraat and the Burgemeester Reigerstraat is expected to also be finished. (Building activities there start in the first quarter of 2020 already.) Utrecht is thus taking one more step to further become a city where people walking and cycling get more space than people in motor traffic. Utrecht wants to be a city for people, not for machines.
My video about the Utrecht Maliebaan of which the central carriageway
will be closed to motor traffic and opened to people walking and cycling.
4 thoughts on “When you design streets for people, not for machines”
Here it is eighteen months later. The construction is done on Nachtegaalstraat . The park next to the Singel is completed. I remember seeing the petitions. I thought maybe they had won because I see nothing happening on Maliebaan. Is the central roadway still going to be removed? I hope so.
Fantastic video Mark – love the historical comparisons! This is very inspiring, and is something I wish we would copy here in the UK.