The Dutch are often asked: What scientific proof is there, that a robust cycling network leads to increased and especially safer cycling? In the Netherlands, this question is challenging to answer due to the absence of a clear “zero-situation”; cycling infrastructure has long existed in some form, and cycling culture has deep roots. However, the city of Seville in Spain provides an interesting case study, as it transformed from minimal cycling activity in the early 21st century to fostering a vibrant cycling climate today. Let’s delve into Seville’s success story and find out if the city may have valuable lessons for the rest of the world.
In 2006, Seville had just 12km of separated cycling paths, with a meagre cycling modal share of 0.5%. Advocates for cycling infrastructure had been pushing for change since 1992, and their plans gained momentum when the United Left (UI) political party adopted them. The UI’s electoral success in 2003 led to a coalition with the Socialists, solidifying cycling plans in the city’s governance.
Tasked with the ambitious plan was José García Cebrián, Seville’s head of urban planning and a long-time cyclist himself. He envisioned a network of protected cycle paths, physically separated from motor traffic, to make cycling accessible to all ages and at slow speeds, even in everyday clothes. What set Seville apart was its commitment to completing an 80km cycling network in one go, with most of the required space repurposed from motor traffic.
While initial planning faced minimal opposition, challenges arose during construction. As Cebrián explains, the lack of resistance during planning was typical in Spain, where cycling plans often remained on paper. The real opposition surfaced during construction, but by then, the city had committed to the transformation. (The Guardian, 2015)
The first 77kms of protected cycling infrastructure, concentrated around the city centre, were completed in under two years (2006-2007). By 2011, the network had expanded to 164km, constituting 12% of the city’s total road length. Presently (2024), the network boasts over 180km, linking key destinations with residential areas.
The immediate success was evident in the surge of daily cyclists, increasing from 6,000 to over 70,000. A 2014 survey highlighted that 6% of all trips and 9% of non-commuter journeys were made by bike. The cycle lanes had an additional advantage: they could also be used by wheelchair users, which suddenly made a lot of the city better accessible.
A key contributor to Seville’s success was the SEVici shared bicycle system, now with 2,500 bikes and 263 stations (2024). Operating as a public-private partnership with JC Decaux, the system provided an affordable option for those without storage space or financial means for a bicycle.
Despite changes in city administration and policies, Seville’s commitment to cycling infrastructure remained steadfast. Between 2006 and 2011, the city of Seville invested 32 million euros in the new cycling network. Research from the University of Seville from 2015 showcased its cost-effectiveness. The construction costs were estimated at 0.27 million euros per km, with annual maintenance costs ranging from 250,000 to 350,000 euros. In 2011, the network was used for around 70,000 trips per day. For comparison: the first line of the metropolitan subway (18 km) cost the city around 35.2 million euros per km. This mode carried around 53,000 daily trips. The 21.5 km of metropolitan city highways under construction had a budget of 30.8 million euros per km, with expected average traffic of 50,000 vehicles per day.
In January 2024, the figures for 2023 were announced. Seville’s cycle paths are now used for 111,125 trips per day, but that includes trips on e-scooters. When you only count the bicycles, they amount to 70,000 daily trips again, which means the figures are back to the pre-Covid levels of 2019.
The success of Seville’s cycling transformation lies in a model prioritising not only safety but also ease and comfort for everyone. Based on Dutch, German and Danish best practice the network’s design focuses on continuity, cohesion, directness, visibility, and comfort. Building bi-directional paths and swift construction were deliberate choices contributing to the overall success. In conclusion, Seville’s experience from 2006 to 2011 illustrates that rapid development of a segregated cycling network can be a powerful catalyst for integrating cycling into urban mobility. Making cycling easy and comfortable for everyone, coupled with additional measures, establishes bicycling as a crucial element of urban transportation. Seville serves as an inspiring example for cities globally seeking to enhance sustainable urban mobility.
Great story. Thanks for that. Not sure why some folks look for the negative in everything. Can’t imagine how one can make the leap from cycling to bullfighting, unless all the cycle paths lead to the bull fighting ring?
Cycling and Seville – what of Seville and bullfighting? Bullfighting isn’t an issue which should be ignored. Bullfighting is barbaric. CAS, one of the world’s leading anti-bullfighting organizations is based in your country. Seville, this ‘cycling paradise’ is a place of public cruelty. Your viewers and commenters should take the time to learn more about bullfighting. The basic scheme is this: one or two stabbings with the picador’s lance, six stabbings with the barbed banderillas, then, when the animal which entered the ring has been sufficiently weakened by its multiple injuries, there follows the stabbing which is intended to kill the bull, with the sword of the matador. Far more often than not, the attempt to kill is a failure, the bull is still very much alive, but now with a sword sticking out from its back. After this, the bull is stabbed in the spine. These attempts to finish the bull off tend to be quite lengthy or very lengthy. The bull may be stabbed twenty times or more before it dies. This is unadulterated cruelty, a disgrace to Seville, a disgrace to Spain – and reflecting no credit on people who make excuses. Provision for cycling isn’t the only way to assess a town or city. If you think that other values can safely be ignored, then I think you’re mistaken.
Gracias, Ricardo. Todos sabemos que eres el alma de esta transformación.
Ricardo Marqués: el alma de esta transformación.
What a fascinating and incisive comparison! Thank you Mark.
QUESTION/s – In the pics “… location in Macarena“:-
1) Which square/road junction is this? – It would be interesting to explore it in streetview.
2) The “before” shows a road leading off to the left – Is that now blocked off?
3) Is the whole of the left hand side now vehicle-free?
Keep up the great work.
Thank you! That’s right the road on the left hand side was a sort of front road. That is completely gone. All pedestrianised now. It is this location. There are lots of pictures of different times in Google Streetview to look around in.